Fractals, part I

PROPERTIES OF FRACTALS

Although there is no precise definition for a fractal, the geometric structures that people refer to when they use the word fractal generally have the following properties.

EXAMPLES OF FRACTALS

Note how the first three fractal properties are all apparent in each of these examples.
  1. Cantor set (Picture of the Cantor Set)
  2. Koch's curve (Picture of Koch's snowflake)
  3. Sierpinski's gasket (Picture of Sierpinksi gasket
  4. Julia sets and the Mandelbrot set Interactive pictures of Mandelbrot and Julia sets)
  5. Fractals defined by iterative function systems (Picture of Barnsley's Fern)

THE "LENGTH" OF THE CANTOR SET

After all of the intervals have been removed and we're left with the Cantor set,what remains looks like just dust. If the original segment weighed 1 pound, how much would the Cantor set weigh? In other words, what is the total measure or length of the Cantor set? We can calculate this by two different methods: adding up the length of all of the intervals that were removed at each step, or calculating the length of what remains at each step. In either case, we finish by taking the limit as the number of steps goes to infinity. Let's use the latter method. After the first step, what remains is 2 intervals of length 1/3, for a total length of 2/3. After the second step, there are 4 intervals of length 1/9, for a total length of 4/9. After the third step, there are 8 intervals of length 1/27, for a total length of 8/27. In general, after the nth step, the length remaining is (2/3)n. Taking the limit as n approaches infinity, we see that the length is 0. For homework, you'll be asked to do a similar type of calculation for Koch's curve and the Sierpinski gasket. The fact that the length is 0 indicates that the Cantor set may not be a dimension 1 set. It's more than a point, though, so it seems that its dimension should be greater than 0. We'll see next how to calculate its dimension.